Established in 2010

About MEPIELAN eBulletin

MEPIELAN E-Bulletin is a digital academic and practitioner newsletter of the MEPIELAN Centre, launched in 2010.  It features insight articles, reflective opinions, specially selected documents and cases, book reviews as well as news on thematic topics of direct interest of MEPIELAN Centre and on the activities and role of MEPIELAN Centre. Its content bridges theory and practice perspectives of relational international law, international environmental law and participatory governance , and international negotiating process, thus serving the primary goal of Centre: to develop an integrated, inter-disciplinary, relational, context-related and sustainably effective governance approach creating, protecting and advancing international common interest for the present and future generations. Providing a knowledge- and information-sharing platform and a scholarly forum, the Bulletin promotes innovative ideas and enlightened critical views, contributing to a broader scholarly debate on important issues of international common interest. The audience of the Bulletin includes academics, practitioners, researchers, university students, international lawyers, officials and personnel of international organizations and institutional arrangements, heads and personnel of national authorities at all levels (national, regional and local), and members of the civil society at large.

Editorial Apr 2013

April 1, 2013

Welcome to the new edition of MEPIELAN E-Bulletin.

I am grateful to all those who have been instrumental in the continuing success of this Bulletin in times of crisis. According to the latest figures, there have been over 12.500 visits to the Bulletin’s website from 151 countries worldwide.

The vision of the Bulletin to provide a dynamic scholarly forum for inter-disciplinary and innovative knowledge on international environmental law and policy with a view to protecting and advancing international common interest is also served by this edition. Distinguished academic experts and scholars as well as of promising young researchers contribute new ideas and enlightening presentations of current issues and problems of international law and policy, environment and development. Together with the continuing flow of topical thematic news, this edition presents a document  of particular interest, the Rio+20 Declaration on Justice, Governance and Law for Environmental Sustainability adopted by UNEP’s World Congress on June 2012 and presented at the Rio+20 Conference, where, interestingly enough, the Principle of Non-Regression (continuity for more effectiveness of environmental protection and sustainable development) is specifically acknowledged, a principle of fundamental importance for sustainability governance capable of effectively and efficiently addressing contemporary challenges and threats.

Serving as a showcase for new knowledge-advancing books, this edition also presents a new insightful and interdisciplinary book “Environmental Governance of the Great Seas – Law and Effect” by Joseph F.C. DiMento and Alexis Jaclyn Hickman. The authors, adopting a comprehensive and contextual approach to the environmental governance of the great seas, shedding light on the function and prospects of selected six regional seas (The Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, the East Asian Seas, the Mediterranean Sea, the West and Central African Seas, and the Wider Caribbean Region) evaluating the effectiveness of their complex and multilevel environmental governance regimes conceptualized as clusters. Perhaps, the most pragmatic theoretical lesson to be drawn is embedded in their “a word on causation”: “Our conclusions about activity in a cluster and outcomes are qualitative and general. It is not possible in the complex environments we are analyzing to describe convincing causal links between individual law and policy initiatives and actual outcomes (whether they be cooperation or improvement of the physical condition of the seas). Many other forces are at work in response of both physical and social systems. And even if elaborate modeling could describe pathways in a convincing manner, data challenges would be enormous, if not overwhelming.”

A Guest Article written by Maguelonne Dejeant-Pons, Head of Division, Policy Development, Democratic Governance Directorate, Council of Europe, provides an authoritative presentation of  the rural heritage  as a factor and a driving force for sustainable spatial development, viewing it as a living heritage with all its tangible and intangible aspects highlighting the importance of assigning to it “heritage value” and of taking action under the European Rural Heritage Observation Guide –CEMAT and the participative approach it advocates. As she concludes, “the rural world is a treasure trove of the cultural, natural and landscape heritage … It is our responsibility to recognize the value of the past, and to protect and promote this heritage, which is an essential factor for economic, social and cultural development”.

Two Insight Articles also feature this edition:

Jos? Juste-Ruiz, Professor of International Law, University of Valencia, Spain, after exploring the elements and present operational status of the IMO Conventional regime on Civil Liability Pollution Damage, perceptively underlines the inherent limitations of this conventional regime and authoritatively examines the creative response to these limitations by the EU and French courts. It is most interesting, in this context, that national courts become instrumental in an evolutionary trend of an international conventional regime enhancing the effective protection of the marine environment and the equitable reparation of damages suffered by victims of oil tanker accidents, and thus giving effect to the legislative purpose of the relevant IMO Conventions and UNCLOS in applying national legislation.

Maria Gavouneli, Assistant Professor of International Law, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, insightfully discusses the new EU draft legislation on offshore installations as a first major comprehensive regime with the most extensive binding international regulation on the offshore industry, particularly highlighting the importance of exploring its contextual inter-linkages, existing EU acquis and related international regimes, from the perspective of their capacity to converge and generate synergies reinforcing the proposed legislation. In this frame, she perceptively pinpoints some areas of concern regarding certain cardinal regulatory elements related to all aspects of the spectrum of offshore operations.

Finally, a Critical Forum Article by Maria Papaioannou, a Ph.D Candidate and Researcher Chair UNESCO “Human Rights, Democracy and Peace”, Panteion University, usefully provides a critical assessment of the World Heritage Convention, underlining its special feature as an autonomous institutional treaty regime governing the protection of world natural and cultural heritage while highlighting certain participatory and conceptual problems related to it as well as its deficiencies demonstrated in specific emergency cases.

MEPIELAN E-Bulletin is a dynamic electronic newsletter of MEPIELAN Centre, Panteion University of Athens, Greece.  It features guest articles, insights articles, critical forum textual contributions and reflections, specially selected documents and cases, book reviews as well as news on thematic topics of direct interest of MEPIELAN Centre, presented in a clear, insightful and attractive way whilst shedding light on topical issues of environmental law, governance and policy significance. Content bridges theory and practice perspectives of international law, international environmental law, sustainable development, and international negotiating process, and includes notifications of MEPIELAN cooperation updates and news. The Bulletin is an addition to our communication instruments which include an edited Series, the MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation.

It is hoped that its content will contribute to a scholarly debate on important issues of current interest, providing an independent, open access forum for the promotion of innovative ideas and enlightened critical views of distinguished authors. The Bulletin further aims at offering a knowledge- and information-sharing platform for MEPIELAN audience, striving to serve a modern thinking and questing community, in the hope that it will stimulate constructive discussions on the issues presented.  The audience includes academics, researchers, university students, international lawyers, officials and personnel of international organizations and institutional arrangements, heads and personnel of national authorities and administration at all levels (national, regional and local), members of Non-Governmental Organizations, as well as the relevant private sector.

Once again, I wish to express my deepest appreciation to all the contributors to this edition and to our faithful worldwide audience sharing with us the progressive ideas, knowledge and message of this Bulletin.

About the author

Evangelos Raftopoulos
Editor and Founding Director of MEPIELAN Centre | [email protected] | Author's Website

Professor of International Law, Panteion University, Athens, Greece, Fellow, C-EENRG, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Related artifacts

Editorial
Transformative Thinking and Steps for Sustainability Democratic Governance in the Post-COVID ERA

Transformative Thinking and Steps for Sustainability Democratic Governance in the Post-COVID ERA

I am elated to welcome you in the new, post-pandemic digital edition of MEPIELAN E-Bulletin. Τhe refurbished digital edition of the 13 years-old Bulletin and the upgraded continuation of its academic and practitioner platform, providing a knowledge- and information-sharing forum that is hosting innovative ideas and a wide spectrum of  scholarly views, reflects a first level response of the Bulletin to the challenges posed by the pandemic.

While the pandemic has been a devastating global event, bringing about significant negative consequences for all of us and at various levels, one can also trace a positive motivational aspect of its impact, directly related to the way we approach, comprehend, and manage the neglected or downgraded richness of the working interdependence of nature, human health and sustainability. Serving as a wake-up call, the pandemic reminded us of the crucial role that nature plays in supporting our well-being and the need for a more participatory, sustainable approach to our actions. In fact, and in a dramatic way, the pandemic has demonstrated the critical link between human health and the health of our environment, and compelled us, by recognizing the interlinkage between ecological integrity and human health, to promote more sustainable normative processes and practices that safeguard both.

We have become increasingly conscious of the catalytic effect of ingraining rights-based approaches, participatory processes, inclusive and equitable considerations in shaping governance and pursuing the implementation of the interdependence of nature, human health and sustainability. More importantly, we are challenged to transform societal, government and expert thinking into a more consistent relational, holistic, process and contextual understanding in comprehending, discussing and collectively managing current and emerging aspects of this interdependence.

Read more text

Editorial
Participatory Environmental Governance: Reflecting on Its Innovative Legal and Political Underpinnings

Participatory Environmental Governance: Reflecting on Its Innovative Legal and Political Underpinnings

An Overview
Let me begin with a rather condensed articulation of the approach to Participatory Environmental Governance.
More than ever, and especially in this dire situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, “participatory environmental governance” (PEG) should not be simply considered and declared as a challenging perspective or an abstract ambition to be “moderately” planned, reached and practiced. In fact, its conceptualization and construction rises well beyond traditional “normal” thinking and perceived applications or doctrinal positivist restrictions. It should be contemplated as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary, relational process capable of generating sustainability and contributing to common interest (international and domestic) in an “ever-changing” world (“meeting the needs of present and future generations”). Integrating political, legal, scientific and social knowledge, thus, effectively addressing the policy-science-society interface at all levels of governance PEG provides an all-encompassing approach to sustainability effectiveness while opening up a roadmap to trust and strong social legitimation.
Participatory environmental governance naturally ingrains a progressive bottom-up approach into the traditional top-down approach to the process of shaping and implementing environmental governance and law-making. As a result, sustainability policies and environmental legislation as well as international duty-obligations and power-rights under conventional environmental regimes, should come under public scrutiny. States should not only secure effective consultation with non-state actors, the public, in their decision-making process managing environmental issues. States should not merely give access to information to the public or disseminate scientific information on their own terms. Increasingly and consistently, States should effectively engage non-state actors, the public, in environmental decision-making process at all levels and in all stages of this process, so that the latter become essential part of the continuous management of sustainability with its ecological, technological, social and ethical implications. Τhe democratization and trust-building of this process, associated with consistent contribution to international/domestic common interest, is the best guarantee for its legitimation, effectiveness and social acceptance. In practice, this invites transformative innovative concepts and policies, public-engaging practices and better understanding of legal and political complementarities in constructing effective environmental governance.
Let me now take you to the streets of this so heavily rich – and so complex but reliable - encompassing approach to PEG, shedding some light into two of its, more daring but far-reaching, underpinnings to better understand its outward evolving institutional life.

Read more text

Editorial Archives

MEPIELAN Activities Forum

Articles Archives

Opinions Archives

Documents & Cases Archives

Books Archives

All News Archives

Thematic News Archives

Member News Archives

Obituaries Archives

Editorial Archives

MEPIELAN Activities Forum

Articles Archives

Opinions Archives

Documents & Cases Archives

Books Archives

All News Archives

Thematic News Archives

Member News Archives

Obituaries Archives